<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>freakified &#187; color management</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.freakified.net/tag/color-management/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.freakified.net</link>
	<description>A state-controlled manufactory of echoes.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 31 Jan 2010 20:08:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Color Management and Firefox 3.1</title>
		<link>http://www.freakified.net/internet/color-management-and-firefox-31/</link>
		<comments>http://www.freakified.net/internet/color-management-and-firefox-31/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Nov 2008 03:30:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>FreakyT</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[color management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[firefox]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mozilla]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.freakified.net/?p=190</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The next version of Firefox, 3.1, is looking up to be a fairly major step up from its predecessor; it includes a variety of new features and improvements, including a new Javascript engine that is much, much faster than that of 3.0.  In fact, some tests are even indicating that Firefox 3.1 can execute Javascript [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The <a href="https://wiki.mozilla.org/Firefox3.1">next version of Firefox</a>, 3.1, is looking up to be a fairly major step up from its predecessor; it includes a variety of new <a href="https://wiki.mozilla.org/Firefox3.1/Features">features and improvements</a>, including <a href="http://ejohn.org/blog/tracemonkey/">a new Javascript engine</a> that is much, much faster than that of 3.0.  In fact, <a href="http://andreasgal.com/2008/09/03/tracemonkey-vs-v8/">some tests</a> are even indicating that Firefox 3.1 can execute Javascript faster than <a href="http://www.google.com/chrome">Google Chrome</a> (which is an accomplishment, to be sure).  Other notable changes include a new <a href="http://mozillalinks.org/wp/2008/07/new-tab-switching-added-for-firefox-31/">tab-switching interface</a>, and built-in support for <a href="http://weblogs.mozillazine.org/gerv/archives/2008/07/firefox_31_will_support_ogg.html">OGG video and audio content</a>.</p>
<p>However, there is another change coming, one that I believe represents a signifigant regression: <a href="http://bholley.wordpress.com/2008/09/12/so-many-colors/">enabling of color management by default</a>.  Now, in theory, this would be a good thing&#8211;after all, color management&#8217;s purpose is to compensate for differences between display devices so that color representation remains constant.  Unfortunately, in my case (and, if I were to extrapolate for the purposes of this article, those of many other users) it performs quite the opposite.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.freakified.net/wp-content/uploads/2008/10/colorbrown.png" rel="lightbox[190]"><img class="size-full wp-image-197 alignleft" title="What pictures look like on my computer vs. others.  Note that this is a simulation, as I couldn't actually caputure the effect with a screenshot." src="http://www.freakified.net/wp-content/uploads/2008/10/colorbrown.png" alt="What pictures look like on my computer vs. others.  Note that this is a simulation, as I couldn't actually caputure the effect with a screenshot." width="300" height="142" /></a></p>
<p>On my <a href="http://h10025.www1.hp.com/ewfrf/wc/product?lc=en&amp;cc=us&amp;dlc=en&amp;product=3370391&amp;lang=en&amp;">computer</a>, regardless of whether I&#8217;m using my monitor or the built-in LCD, turning color management on has a tendency to cause images to be rendered as if they were shining through a brownish filter.  Not one to miss a beat, images that look fine on my computer are likewise rendered as brownish on other color-mangement enabled computers.  Granted, that&#8217;s through no inherent fault of color management, but rather though the fact that my monitors seem to have come with faulty <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Icc_profile">ICC profiles</a>.  However, the issue remains clear: if <em>my</em> computer came installed with a faulty profile, how many <em>others&#8217; </em>computers did as well?  And with that situation as it is, does it really make sense to enable color managment by default in <em>any</em> web browser?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.freakified.net/internet/color-management-and-firefox-31/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
